Understanding Material until Failure

The me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­­tion of con­t­in­u­ous fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­­forced ther­­­­­­­­­­­mo­­­­­­­­­­­plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites is chal­leng­ing. On the one hand, the me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal­­­­­­­­­­­ly non-lin­ear, or­thotrop­ic ma­te­ri­al be­hav­ior re­quires the char­ac­ter­i­za­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­tion of a to­­­­­­­­­­­tal of five ma­te­ri­al func­­­­­­­­­­­tions to ful­­­­­­­­­­­ly de­scribe the stress-strain be­hav­ior. On the oth­­­­­­­­­­­er hand, the fail­ure be­hav­ior is strong­­­­­­­­­­­ly de­pen­­­­­­­­­­­dent on the re­spec­­­­­­­­­­­tive stress state and the in­­­­­­­­­­­ter­ac­­­­­­­­­­­tion of in­­­­­­­­­­­di­vid­u­al stress com­po­­­­­­­­­­­nents, which makes mod­­­­­­­­­­­el­ing even more dif­­­­­­­­­­­fi­cult.

To fully exploit the immense potential of these materials in practice, we pursue the following approach:

Scanning electron microscope image of a carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6

Experimental Characterization

The ex­act char­ac­ter­i­za­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­tion of the me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal ma­te­ri­al be­hav­ior is cru­­­­­­­­­­­cial for the ef­­­­­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­­­­­cient com­po­­­­­­­­­­­nent de­sign of fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­­forced plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites. The se­lec­­­­­­­­­­­tion and ap­­­­­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­­­­­tion of suit­­­­­­­­­­­able ex­per­i­­­­­­­­­­­men­­­­­­­­­­­tal meth­ods for de­ter­min­ing the ma­te­ri­al char­ac­ter­is­tics is of par­tic­u­lar im­­­­­­­­­­­por­­­­­­­­­­­tance. In con­­­­­­­­­­­trast to met­al­lic ma­te­ri­als such as steel or alu­minum, for which two char­ac­ter­is­tic val­ues (mod­­­­­­­­­­­u­lus of elas­tic­i­­­­­­­­­­­ty and tran­s­­­­­­­­­­­verse con­­­­­­­­­­­trac­­­­­­­­­­­tion co­e­f­­­­­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­­­­­cien­t) are usu­al­­­­­­­­­­­ly suf­­­­­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­­­­­cien­t, a to­­­­­­­­­­­tal of four char­ac­ter­is­tic val­ues must be de­ter­mined for fiber-plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites in the plane stress state and even five in the gen­er­al stress state. This re­quires the use of mul­ti-ax­is test­ing tech­niques in com­bi­­­­­­­­­­­na­­­­­­­­­­­tion with pre­­­­­­­­­­­cise mea­­­­­­­­­­­sure­­­­­­­­­­­ment meth­od­s, such as op­ti­­­­­­­­­­­cal strain mea­­­­­­­­­­­sure­­­­­­­­­­­men­t.

We im­­­­­­­­­­­ple­­­­­­­­­­­ment pre­­­­­­­­­­­cise­­­­­­­­­­­ly this ap­proach for our ma­te­ri­als and thus cre­ate a ba­­­­­­­­­­­sis for sys­tem­at­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal­­­­­­­­­­­ly ex­­­­­­­­­­­ploit­ing their full me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal po­ten­­­­­­­­­­­tial in the ap­­­­­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­­­­­tion.

Biaxial test specimen for testing fiber-reinforced composites
Microscopy of a fiber-reinforced composite
Failure of a fiber-reinforced composite under compression
Failure of a fiber-reinforced composite under shear

Material Modeling Based on Our Own Database

Frac­­­­­­­­­ture Curve of Car­bon-Fiber Re­in­­­­­­­­­­­forced Polyamide 6 (CF­­­­­­­­­PA6) in In-Plane Stress

Fracture curve of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide-6

The de­ter­mined ma­te­ri­al char­ac­ter­is­tics must be made us­able in prac­tice for en­gi­neers and com­po­­­­­­­­­­­nent de­sign­er­s. A par­tic­u­lar chal­lenge lies in the de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­­tion of the fail­ure mech­a­nis­m­s, as fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­­forced plas­tics can ex­hib­it dif­fer­­­­­­­­­­­ent fail­ure modes re­­­­­­­­­­­sult­ing from stress in­­­­­­­­­­­ter­ac­­­­­­­­­­­tion.

To this end, we have de­vel­oped our own ma­te­ri­al mod­­­­­­­­­­­el that en­ables a non-lin­ear de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­­tion of con­t­in­u­ous fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­­forced plas­tics and in­­­­­­­­­­­te­­­­­­­­­­­grates a suit­­­­­­­­­­­able fail­ure mod­­­­­­­­­­­el. This gives us a sim­­­­­­­­­­­ple and ef­fec­­­­­­­­­­­tive ap­proach to de­sign­ing high­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ly stressed com­po­­­­­­­­­­­nents based on our ma­te­ri­al­s.

Our mod­­­­­­­­­­­el is based on the re­­­­­­­­­­­sults of sev­er­al years of re­search by the Leib­niz-In­­­­­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­­­­­tute for Com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ite Ma­te­ri­als (leib­niz-ivw.de). In close co­op­er­a­­­­­­­­­­­tion with the in­­­­­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­­­­­tute, we con­t­in­u­ous­­­­­­­­­­­ly adapt the mod­­­­­­­­­­­el­ing to our new ma­te­ri­al­s.

Composite Specific Component Design

Our ma­te­ri­als have enor­­­­­­­­­­­mous po­ten­­­­­­­­­­­tial-pro­vid­ed they are used in a tar­get­ed and suit­­­­­­­­­­­able man­n­er. Due to their di­rec­­­­­­­­­­­tion-de­pen­­­­­­­­­­­dent me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal be­hav­ior, com­po­­­­­­­­­­­nents made from com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites re­quire spe­­­­­­­­­­­cif­ic de­sign prin­­­­­­­­­­­ci­­­­­­­­­­­ples. Ar­eas where loads are ap­­­­­­­­­­­plied and zones where sta­­­­­­­­­­­bil­i­­­­­­­­­­­ty is at risk are par­tic­u­lar­­­­­­­­­­­ly crit­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal. Tar­get­ed de­sign ad­just­­­­­­­­­­­ments can achieve an eco­nom­i­­­­­­­­­­­cal, func­­­­­­­­­­­tion­al and ma­te­ri­al-spe­­­­­­­­­­­cif­ic de­sign.

Sim­­­­­­­­­­­ply sub­­­­­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­­­­­tut­ing con­ven­­­­­­­­­­­tion­al met­al com­po­­­­­­­­­­­nents with com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ite parts does not usu­al­­­­­­­­­­­ly lead to the de­sired re­­­­­­­­­­­sult­s.

As de­sign­er and pro­­­­­­­­­­­duc­er of these ma­te­ri­al­s, we have in-depth ex­per­­­­­­­­­­­tise and sup­­­­­­­­­­­port you in ex­­­­­­­­­­­ploit­ing their full po­ten­­­­­­­­­­­tial for your ap­­­­­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­­­­­tion in a tar­get-ori­en­t­ed way-on re­quest al­­­­­­­­­­­so through FEA-sup­­­­­­­­­­­port­ed de­sign and anal­y­­­­­­­­­­­sis. For this pur­­­­­­­­­­­pose, we use our own ma­te­ri­al mod­­­­­­­­­­­el, spe­­­­­­­­­­­cial­­­­­­­­­­­ly de­vel­oped for the non-lin­ear de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­­tion and fail­ure be­hav­ior of our fiber ther­­­­­­­­­­­mo­­­­­­­­­­­plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites.

Manufacturing drawing of a component
Gear made of fiber-reinforced composites
Concepts for load introduction in fibre-reinforced composites
Triaxiality of the material stress of a fibre-reinforced composite under transverse pressure

USE OF COOKIES