Understanding Material until Failure

The me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­cal de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­tion of con­t­in­u­ous fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­forced ther­­­­­­­­­­mo­­­­­­­­­­plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites is chal­leng­ing. On the one hand, the me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­cal­­­­­­­­­­ly non-lin­ear, or­thotrop­ic ma­te­ri­al be­hav­ior re­quires the char­ac­ter­i­za­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­tion of a to­­­­­­­­­­tal of five ma­te­ri­al func­­­­­­­­­­tions to ful­­­­­­­­­­ly de­scribe the stress-strain be­hav­ior. On the oth­­­­­­­­­­er hand, the fail­ure be­hav­ior is strong­­­­­­­­­­ly de­pen­­­­­­­­­­dent on the re­spec­­­­­­­­­­tive stress state and the in­­­­­­­­­­ter­ac­­­­­­­­­­tion of in­­­­­­­­­­di­vid­u­al stress com­po­­­­­­­­­­nents, which makes mod­­­­­­­­­­el­ing even more dif­­­­­­­­­­fi­cult.

To fully exploit the immense potential of these materials in practice, we pursue the following approach:

Scanning electron microscope image of a carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6

Experimental Characterization

The ex­act char­ac­ter­i­za­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­tion of the me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­cal ma­te­ri­al be­hav­ior is cru­­­­­­­­­­cial for the ef­­­­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­­­­cient com­po­­­­­­­­­­nent de­sign of fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­forced plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites. The se­lec­­­­­­­­­­tion and ap­­­­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­­­­tion of suit­­­­­­­­­­able ex­per­i­­­­­­­­­­men­­­­­­­­­­tal meth­ods for de­ter­min­ing the ma­te­ri­al char­ac­ter­is­tics is of par­tic­u­lar im­­­­­­­­­­por­­­­­­­­­­tance. In con­­­­­­­­­­trast to met­al­lic ma­te­ri­als such as steel or alu­minum, for which two char­ac­ter­is­tic val­ues (mod­­­­­­­­­­u­lus of elas­tic­i­­­­­­­­­­ty and tran­s­­­­­­­­­­verse con­­­­­­­­­­trac­­­­­­­­­­tion co­e­f­­­­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­­­­cien­t) are usu­al­­­­­­­­­­ly suf­­­­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­­­­cien­t, a to­­­­­­­­­­tal of four char­ac­ter­is­tic val­ues must be de­ter­mined for fiber-plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites in the plane stress state and even five in the gen­er­al stress state. This re­quires the use of mul­ti-ax­is test­ing tech­niques in com­bi­­­­­­­­­­na­­­­­­­­­­tion with pre­­­­­­­­­­cise mea­­­­­­­­­­sure­­­­­­­­­­ment meth­od­s, such as op­ti­­­­­­­­­­cal strain mea­­­­­­­­­­sure­­­­­­­­­­men­t.

We im­­­­­­­­­­ple­­­­­­­­­­ment pre­­­­­­­­­­cise­­­­­­­­­­ly this ap­proach for our ma­te­ri­als and thus cre­ate a ba­­­­­­­­­­sis for sys­tem­at­i­­­­­­­­­­cal­­­­­­­­­­ly ex­­­­­­­­­­ploit­ing their full me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­cal po­ten­­­­­­­­­­tial in the ap­­­­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­­­­tion.

Biaxial test specimen for testing fiber-reinforced composites
Microscopy of a fiber-reinforced composite
Failure of a fiber-reinforced composite under compression
Failure of a fiber-reinforced composite under shear

Material Modeling Based on Our Own Database

Frac­­­­­­­­ture Curve of Car­bon-Fiber Re­in­­­­­­­­­­forced Polyamide 6 (CF­­­­­­­­PA6) in In-Plane Stress

Fracture curve of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide-6

The de­ter­mined ma­te­ri­al char­ac­ter­is­tics must be made us­able in prac­tice for en­gi­neers and com­po­­­­­­­­­­nent de­sign­er­s. A par­tic­u­lar chal­lenge lies in the de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­tion of the fail­ure mech­a­nis­m­s, as fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­forced plas­tics can ex­hib­it dif­fer­­­­­­­­­­ent fail­ure modes re­­­­­­­­­­sult­ing from stress in­­­­­­­­­­ter­ac­­­­­­­­­­tion.

To this end, we have de­vel­oped our own ma­te­ri­al mod­­­­­­­­­­el that en­ables a non-lin­ear de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­tion of con­t­in­u­ous fiber-re­in­­­­­­­­­­forced plas­tics and in­­­­­­­­­­te­­­­­­­­­­grates a suit­­­­­­­­­­able fail­ure mod­­­­­­­­­­el. This gives us a sim­­­­­­­­­­ple and ef­fec­­­­­­­­­­tive ap­proach to de­sign­ing high­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ly stressed com­po­­­­­­­­­­nents based on our ma­te­ri­al­s.

Our mod­­­­­­­­­­el is based on the re­­­­­­­­­­sults of sev­er­al years of re­search by the Leib­niz-In­­­­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­­­­tute for Com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ite Ma­te­ri­als (leib­niz-ivw.de). In close co­op­er­a­­­­­­­­­­tion with the in­­­­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­­­­tute, we con­t­in­u­ous­­­­­­­­­­ly adapt the mod­­­­­­­­­­el­ing to our new ma­te­ri­al­s.

Composite Specific Component Design

Our ma­te­ri­als have enor­­­­­­­­­­mous po­ten­­­­­­­­­­tial-pro­vid­ed they are used in a tar­get­ed and suit­­­­­­­­­­able man­n­er. Due to their di­rec­­­­­­­­­­tion-de­pen­­­­­­­­­­dent me­chan­i­­­­­­­­­­cal be­hav­ior, com­po­­­­­­­­­­nents made from com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites re­quire spe­­­­­­­­­­cif­ic de­sign prin­­­­­­­­­­ci­­­­­­­­­­ples. Ar­eas where loads are ap­­­­­­­­­­plied and zones where sta­­­­­­­­­­bil­i­­­­­­­­­­ty is at risk are par­tic­u­lar­­­­­­­­­­ly crit­i­­­­­­­­­­cal. Tar­get­ed de­sign ad­just­­­­­­­­­­ments can achieve an eco­nom­i­­­­­­­­­­cal, func­­­­­­­­­­tion­al and ma­te­ri­al-spe­­­­­­­­­­cif­ic de­sign.

Sim­­­­­­­­­­ply sub­­­­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­­­­tut­ing con­ven­­­­­­­­­­tion­al met­al com­po­­­­­­­­­­nents with com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ite parts does not usu­al­­­­­­­­­­ly lead to the de­sired re­­­­­­­­­­sult­s.

As de­sign­er and pro­­­­­­­­­­duc­er of these ma­te­ri­al­s, we have in-depth ex­per­­­­­­­­­­tise and sup­­­­­­­­­­port you in ex­­­­­­­­­­ploit­ing their full po­ten­­­­­­­­­­tial for your ap­­­­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­­­­tion in a tar­get-ori­en­t­ed way-on re­quest al­­­­­­­­­­so through FEA-sup­­­­­­­­­­port­ed de­sign and anal­y­­­­­­­­­­sis. For this pur­­­­­­­­­­pose, we use our own ma­te­ri­al mod­­­­­­­­­­el, spe­­­­­­­­­­cial­­­­­­­­­­ly de­vel­oped for the non-lin­ear de­scrip­­­­­­­­­­tion and fail­ure be­hav­ior of our fiber ther­­­­­­­­­­mo­­­­­­­­­­plas­tic com­­­­­­­­­­pos­ites.

Manufacturing drawing of a component
Gear made of fiber-reinforced composites
Concepts for load introduction in fibre-reinforced composites
Triaxiality of the material stress of a fibre-reinforced composite under transverse pressure

USE OF COOKIES