Understanding Material until Failure

The me­chan­i­­­­­­­cal de­scrip­­­­­­­tion of con­t­in­u­ous fiber-re­in­­­­­­­forced ther­­­­­­­mo­­­­­­­plas­tic com­­­­­­­pos­ites is chal­leng­ing. On the one hand, the me­chan­i­­­­­­­cal­­­­­­­ly non-lin­ear, or­thotrop­ic ma­te­ri­al be­hav­ior re­quires the char­ac­ter­i­za­­­­­­­­­­­­­tion of a to­­­­­­­tal of five ma­te­ri­al func­­­­­­­tions to ful­­­­­­­ly de­scribe the stress-strain be­hav­ior. On the oth­­­­­­­er hand, the fail­ure be­hav­ior is strong­­­­­­­ly de­pen­­­­­­­dent on the re­spec­­­­­­­tive stress state and the in­­­­­­­ter­ac­­­­­­­tion of in­­­­­­­di­vid­u­al stress com­po­­­­­­­nents, which makes mod­­­­­­­el­ing even more dif­­­­­­­fi­cult.

To fully exploit the immense potential of these materials in practice, we pursue the following approach:

Scanning electron microscope image of a carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6

Experimental Characterization

The ex­act char­ac­ter­i­za­­­­­­­­­­­­­tion of the me­chan­i­­­­­­­cal ma­te­ri­al be­hav­ior is cru­­­­­­­cial for the ef­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­cient com­po­­­­­­­nent de­sign of fiber-re­in­­­­­­­forced plas­tic com­­­­­­­pos­ites. The se­lec­­­­­­­tion and ap­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­tion of suit­­­­­­­able ex­per­i­­­­­­­men­­­­­­­tal meth­ods for de­ter­min­ing the ma­te­ri­al char­ac­ter­is­tics is of par­tic­u­lar im­­­­­­­por­­­­­­­tance. In con­­­­­­­trast to met­al­lic ma­te­ri­als such as steel or alu­minum, for which two char­ac­ter­is­tic val­ues (mod­­­­­­­u­lus of elas­tic­i­­­­­­­ty and tran­s­­­­­­­verse con­­­­­­­trac­­­­­­­tion co­e­f­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­cien­t) are usu­al­­­­­­­ly suf­­­­­­­fi­­­­­­­cien­t, a to­­­­­­­tal of four char­ac­ter­is­tic val­ues must be de­ter­mined for fiber-plas­tic com­­­­­­­pos­ites in the plane stress state and even five in the gen­er­al stress state. This re­quires the use of mul­ti-ax­is test­ing tech­niques in com­bi­­­­­­­na­­­­­­­tion with pre­­­­­­­cise mea­­­­­­­sure­­­­­­­ment meth­od­s, such as op­ti­­­­­­­cal strain mea­­­­­­­sure­­­­­­­men­t.

We im­­­­­­­ple­­­­­­­ment pre­­­­­­­cise­­­­­­­ly this ap­proach for our ma­te­ri­als and thus cre­ate a ba­­­­­­­sis for sys­tem­at­i­­­­­­­cal­­­­­­­ly ex­­­­­­­ploit­ing their full me­chan­i­­­­­­­cal po­ten­­­­­­­tial in the ap­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­tion.

Biaxial test specimen for testing fiber-reinforced composites
Microscopy of a fiber-reinforced composite
Failure of a fiber-reinforced composite under compression
Failure of a fiber-reinforced composite under shear

Material Modeling Based on Our Own Database

Frac­­­­­ture Curve of Car­bon-Fiber Re­in­­­­­­­forced Polyamide 6 (CF­­­­­PA6) in In-Plane Stress

Fracture curve of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide-6

The de­ter­mined ma­te­ri­al char­ac­ter­is­tics must be made us­able in prac­tice for en­gi­neers and com­po­­­­­­­nent de­sign­er­s. A par­tic­u­lar chal­lenge lies in the de­scrip­­­­­­­tion of the fail­ure mech­a­nis­m­s, as fiber-re­in­­­­­­­forced plas­tics can ex­hib­it dif­fer­­­­­­­ent fail­ure modes re­­­­­­­sult­ing from stress in­­­­­­­ter­ac­­­­­­­tion.

To this end, we have de­vel­oped our own ma­te­ri­al mod­­­­­­­el that en­ables a non-lin­ear de­scrip­­­­­­­tion of con­t­in­u­ous fiber-re­in­­­­­­­forced plas­tics and in­­­­­­­te­­­­­­­grates a suit­­­­­­­able fail­ure mod­­­­­­­el. This gives us a sim­­­­­­­ple and ef­fec­­­­­­­tive ap­proach to de­sign­ing high­­­­­­­­­­­­­ly stressed com­po­­­­­­­nents based on our ma­te­ri­al­s.

Our mod­­­­­­­el is based on the re­­­­­­­sults of sev­er­al years of re­search by the Leib­niz-In­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­tute for Com­­­­­­­pos­ite Ma­te­ri­als (leib­niz-ivw.de). In close co­op­er­a­­­­­­­tion with the in­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­tute, we con­t­in­u­ous­­­­­­­ly adapt the mod­­­­­­­el­ing to our new ma­te­ri­al­s.

Composite Specific Component Design

Our ma­te­ri­als have enor­­­­­­­mous po­ten­­­­­­­tial-pro­vid­ed they are used in a tar­get­ed and suit­­­­­­­able man­n­er. Due to their di­rec­­­­­­­tion-de­pen­­­­­­­dent me­chan­i­­­­­­­cal be­hav­ior, com­po­­­­­­­nents made from com­­­­­­­pos­ites re­quire spe­­­­­­­cif­ic de­sign prin­­­­­­­ci­­­­­­­ples. Ar­eas where loads are ap­­­­­­­plied and zones where sta­­­­­­­bil­i­­­­­­­ty is at risk are par­tic­u­lar­­­­­­­ly crit­i­­­­­­­cal. Tar­get­ed de­sign ad­just­­­­­­­ments can achieve an eco­nom­i­­­­­­­cal, func­­­­­­­tion­al and ma­te­ri­al-spe­­­­­­­cif­ic de­sign.

Sim­­­­­­­ply sub­­­­­­­sti­­­­­­­tut­ing con­ven­­­­­­­tion­al met­al com­po­­­­­­­nents with com­­­­­­­pos­ite parts does not usu­al­­­­­­­ly lead to the de­sired re­­­­­­­sult­s.

As de­sign­er and pro­­­­­­­duc­er of these ma­te­ri­al­s, we have in-depth ex­per­­­­­­­tise and sup­­­­­­­port you in ex­­­­­­­ploit­ing their full po­ten­­­­­­­tial for your ap­­­­­­­pli­­­­­­­ca­­­­­­­tion in a tar­get-ori­en­t­ed way-on re­quest al­­­­­­­so through FEA-sup­­­­­­­port­ed de­sign and anal­y­­­­­­­sis. For this pur­­­­­­­pose, we use our own ma­te­ri­al mod­­­­­­­el, spe­­­­­­­cial­­­­­­­ly de­vel­oped for the non-lin­ear de­scrip­­­­­­­tion and fail­ure be­hav­ior of our fiber ther­­­­­­­mo­­­­­­­plas­tic com­­­­­­­pos­ites.

Manufacturing drawing of a component
Gear made of fiber-reinforced composites
Concepts for load introduction in fibre-reinforced composites
Triaxiality of the material stress of a fibre-reinforced composite under transverse pressure

USE OF COOKIES